School Improvement Plan (SIP) - Performance Audit Form

A comprehensive review framework for educational quality.

Audit Information

School Name:

Affiliation Board:

Audit Date:

Class Observed (If Specific):

Section Observed (If Specific):

RUBRIC SCALE

Rating	Descriptor
4 - Exemplary	Highly Effective (Evident in all areas, systematic, and has measurable impact)
3 - Proficient	Effective (Partially Implemented, Consistent & Effective)
2 - Developing	Developing (Partially Implemented, Inconsistent or limited in scope)
1 - Emerging	Need Improvement (Limited or no evidence of being Implemented)

Select Standards to Audit

Standard 1: Leadership, Governance, Parents & Community

Standard 2: Teaching, Learning & Assessment

Standard 3: Student Achievement

Standard 4: Curriculum Design & Implementation

Standard 5: Student Personal & Social Development

Standard 6: Safety & Health

STANDARD 1: Leadership, Governance, Parents & Community

1.1 Vision, Mission & Core Values

a. Are the vision, mission, and core values visible across the campus?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. How do these values influence decisions and daily operations?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

c. Are they periodically reviewed with stakeholders?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

1.2 Strategic and Distributive Leadership

a. Does leadership promote collaboration, integrity, and inclusion?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. How effectively does the school delegate responsibilities and empower middle leaders?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

c. Are staff provided with clear roles and responsibilities?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

1.3 Governance Structure, Roles and Accountability

a. Is there a documented governance reporting structure?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. How does the governing body monitor academic and financial performance?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

c. Are decisions evidence-based and communicated clearly?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

1.4 School Improvement Planning and Review

a. Is there an improvement plan tied to data assessments and transparent goals?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Are resources allocated appropriately, and is progress tracked?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

1.5 Parent and Community Engagement & Partnerships

a. How does the school involve parents in decision-making or volunteering?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Does the school communicate regularly and transparently with parents?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

c. Are community partnerships utilized to enhance learning?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

STANDARD 2: Teaching, Learning & Assessment

2.1 Quality of Teaching and Learning

a. Are lessons aligned with learning outcomes and objectives?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Do teachers use diverse pedagogies (group work, inquiry, projects)?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

c. Are lessons observed and followed up with feedback?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

2.2 Differentiation and Inclusive Teaching

a. Are there explicit strategies for mixed-ability learners?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Are accommodations made for SEN and gifted students?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

c. Are teachers trained in differentiated practices?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

2.3 Learning Environment and Student Engagement

a. Is the classroom organized, safe, and learner-centered?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Is student voice encouraged during lessons?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

c. Are learning displays purposeful and inclusive?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

2.4 Assessment for, of and as Learning

a. Are teachers using varied assessment tools (quizzes, rubrics, peer/self)?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Are assessment outcomes used to modify instruction?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

c. Is student reflection encouraged?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

2.5 Use of Assessment Data and Tracking Progress

a. Is there regular moderation of student work to ensure consistency?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Do teachers receive constructive feedback on their assessment practices?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

2.6 Feedback and Reporting

a. Is feedback personalized, constructive, and timely?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Are progress reports clear and skill-based?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

c. Are parents informed about improvement plans?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

STANDARD 3: Student Achievement

3.1 Academic Progress and Attainment

a. Are learning targets realistic and monitored?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Are high expectations set for all students?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

c. Is there evidence of year-on-year progress?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

3.2 Achievement Across Subjects and Skills

a. How do learning outcomes compare across grades and departments?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. How does the school identify and support underperforming subjects?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

3.3 Performance in External Examinations and Benchmarks

a. Are students prepared for external exams (e.g., IGCSE, CBSE)?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Are exam results analyzed to identify areas for improvement?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

3.4 Closing Achievement Gaps (Equity and Inclusion)

a. Are exit data available on gender, SEN, and socioeconomic performance gaps?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Are targeted programs implemented to narrow these learners?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

3.5 College, Career and Future Readiness

a. Does the school provide structured career counseling and workshops?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Are students exposed to industrial visits and internships?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

c. Are skills like problem-solving, financial literacy, and entrepreneurship taught?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

STANDARD 4: Curriculum Design & Implementation

4.1 Curriculum Design, Alignment and Coherence

a. Is the curriculum aligned with NEP 2020/Cambridge/CBSE expectations?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Are vertical and horizontal progressions well-mapped?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

4.2 Integration of Skills

a. Are 21st-century skills integrated into lesson plans?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Are interdisciplinary and project-based approaches promoted?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

4.3 Integration of Digital Literacy and Technology

a. Is local content integrated where relevant?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Are global perspectives embedded across subjects?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

4.4 Co-curricular, Sports and Enrichment Integration

a. Are arts, sports, and clubs scheduled and linked to learning goals?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Are achievements celebrated and recorded?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

4.5 Curriculum Review and Innovation

a. Are resources (labs, libraries, tech) sufficient and accessible?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Is there a system for resource requests?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

c. How does the school promote equity and inclusivity?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

STANDARD 5: Student Personal & Social Development

5.1 Social and Emotional Development

a. Are there regular SEL lessons or wellbeing programs?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Do students engage in mindfulness or gratitude activities?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

c. How does the school promote empathy and resilience?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

5.2 Student Discipline and Attendance

a. Is there a clear code of conduct?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Are behavior management strategies positive and preventative?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

c. Are incidents tracked and reviewed?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

5.3 Inclusion and Support for Diverse Learners (SEN/Gifted)

a. Are students encouraged to take initiative and leadership roles?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Are student-led clubs active and impactful?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

5.4 Student Voice and Leadership

a. Do students have trusted adults they can approach for support?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Are mental health resources available?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

5.5 Life Skills, Values and Citizenship Education

a. Do students learn about responsible citizenship and civic engagement?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Are they aware of the decision-making in school and community?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

STANDARD 6: Safety & Health

6.1 Student Safety and Protection

a. Are child protection policies visible and implemented?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Is staff trained in POCSO awareness and reporting?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

6.2 Safe Infrastructure and Campus Environment

a. Are facilities well-maintained (fire, seismic, playground)?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Are safety certificates available for all installations?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

6.3 Risk Management and Emergency Preparedness

a. Is there a comprehensive health education program?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Are students taught about nutrition, hygiene, and mental health?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

6.4 Cyber Safety and Data Protection

a. Are students and parents trained on cyber safety protocols?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

b. Is data privacy maintained across digital systems?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

c. Is there a digital use policy for staff and students?

Rating (1-4):

Descriptor:

Evidence Observed:

Remarks:

Overall School Performance Summary

Standard	Average Rating	Strengths	Areas for Improvement
Leadership, Governance, Community
Teaching, Learning & Assessment
Student Achievement
Curriculum Design & Implementation
Student Personal & Social Development
Safety & Health

Auditor's Sign-off & Overall Rating

Auditor's Digital Signature:

Overall School Rating: